What does it all mean? Having just asked that twice in a comment on Child_Of_Tree's site (although my fingers are convinced that she's still OneDivineSpark), I then got to pondering what it does all mean.
Of course, it depends on what we mean by 'it'. And, already, the essayist in me is pulling apart the question in order to avoid actually answering the whole thing. After all, these things are best dealt with in small, easy to digest, chunks, right? Rather the way life is. We don't take on life all at once, so why try to take on the big questions on all at once as well?
There we are. Another set of questions. You can tell why my tutors used to get annoyed. If it wasn't for the new batch of questions that I used to produce, it was the parentheses (currently only two sets in this whole post. But, we all know - at least we should by now, that I cannot manage to type a whole post, or write a whole letter, without parentheses. I can just about manage to log a job at work without the use of parentheses, but that's it).
It. What is 'it'? How are we defining 'it'? A great bit ITthat will cover absolutely everything in life, the one true answer, the ultimate, 42, answer to the ultimate, unknown, question? Or are we looking at a whole batch of tiny little its that add up to make the big one, but each of them are different (if I were any good at that sort of thing, and also had the time - but I'm supposed to be seeing Emma for lunch, which could be interesting since I have £8 in cash and that's it to my name at the moment, until I remember what my Barclaycard pin is - I would produce a nice big IT which is made up of lots of little its, all of different fonts and of different sizes: and perhaps put it at the back of this post as a background, if I could work out how to do that sort of clever stuff, and I really cared, which, to be honest, I don't. I'm not an artist. Merely an artisan). I'd say that each it is singular to the time and place that the observer happens to be in; perhaps, we could go further, and get a bit scientific, and say by the very act of observing and considering the individual it, we are affecting it in some way, shape or form. An it can be more than one thing at a time, it can exist, ever changing until we actually observe it, and make it's inherent it-ness more concrete. Very Quantum.
Maybe it's just the right size for whatever it is that we feel like contemplating today? Settles in nicely, not-too-big, not-too-small, but just right - like the porridge that Goldilocks ate. Not too hot, or too cold, or too hard or soft. Because, let's face it, when considering these deep and meaningful questions, we can make it as hard or as easy as we like. Start off by reading Sophie's World, finish off with A Brief History of Time or a History of Mankind. (I've just tried to explain this to my flatmate, but with fewer words. She's decided to unload the washing machine, after looking as though her brain was about to turn inside out). Or, give up on Sophie's World and retreat to Watership Down or Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day.
Perhaps it's all about trying? Even if we can't establish what it all means, the mere act of questioning what it might be, and what it might mean is a good start.
At the moment, it all seems to be a diabolical conspiracy to prevent us from hanging out our washing on the sunny days of the weekend (the garden is, once again, taken over by Phillippino teenagers who are working on some sort of dance routine. It happens every sunny Sunday - and Saturday is invariably less sunny).
xxx
Recent Comments